The Round Trip: Why Photoshop Matters (Part 2)

In the last post I declared that Photoshop is essential to effective photo editing. Let's now explore why this is true. While parametric editing with applications like Lightroom and Aperture are efficient, convenient, and non-destructive, we often need access to the tools and capabilities of Photoshop. In fact, I'd argue that we always need them—as long as we have the time and resources to do so.

It should be noted that more and more plugins are available to be used with Lightroom and Aperture without the intervention or support of Photoshop. This drastically extends capabilities. But, it also creates a new image file, much like what we get with the roundtrip to Photoshop. So, I'd argue that we might use these plugins with Photoshop instead as it ultimately gives us much more control.

Click to read more ...

The Round Trip: Why Photoshop Matters (Part 1)

Hermit's Creek Canyon | Mark Lindsay

Raw processing of digital images has become a standard and essential part of the serious, digital workflow. Applications like Adobe's Lightroom and Apple's Aperture have revolutionized imaging workflow. They provide us photographers with efficient and lightweight editing capabilities for our images. One might surmise that this will render Photoshop obsolete. Why invest in a complex and expensive application that takes years to master when very good images can be made quickly and intuitively elsewhere? The argument for the elimination of Photoshop might be compelling but it is also wrong.

Click to read more ...

My Apps and I

Digital Asset Management requires the careful choosing of image-editing and media-management applications. No decision could be more critical in the pursuit of the imaging workflow. The features of today's application software are enticing. Best-practice workflows depend upon sound decisions with regards to application software. Yet, our workflows must remain adaptable and somewhat independent of any one piece of software. So, what's the best choice in all this?

Click to read more ...

Blow Out, Part 5: RAW Processors

Please Note: This will be the last post on highlights for now. We'll be offering some advanced highlight-recovery tricks at a later date.

Every RAW processor will handle highlights differently. For example, being a Mac user, I have the opportunity to test image processing with both Apple's Aperture and Adobe's Photoshop Lightroom. I find that Aperture can recover blown highlights just a little bit more elegantly than can Lightroom. Yet Lightroom's interface is more straightforward and easier to master. RAW processors have nuances and characteristics to their resulting images that remind me of the personalities of various types of film. We can fine-tune these processors to achieve various effects but that's beyond the scope of this discussion.

Click to read more ...